Ability to re-push the Secfix Security Training to users who already completed them

The reason is that if you have a security incident, it is useful (and good proof for the auditor) to reinforce people to do the training again, for a refresh of information. Admins should be able to request that employees complete the training again.

Anita Luca 1 day ago

💡

Feature Request

Trust collaborator role

A Trust Center collaborator needs access only to the Trust Center dashboard to review, approve, or reject access requests. Typically, a trust center collaborator doesn’t have any other responsibilities in Secfix beyond handling Trust Center requests.

Jakub Wanat 19 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Provide secure development trainings

Some of our customers and prospects are increasingly asking whether our engineers have completed secure coding training. This topic is becoming more relevant for companies, especially in the context of security frameworks and customer security requirements. To help address these requests, it would be very valuable if Secfix could provide a secure coding training directly within the Secfix platform. Ideally, this training would be targeted at developers and aligned with relevant security best practices and frameworks (e.g., ISO 27002). Having such training available in the platform would help us demonstrate that our engineers are trained in secure development practices and make it easier to meet security expectations from customers and prospects.

Andreas Offermann 4 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Ability to undo "mark as not a person" action on employees page

I think if we (an admin) mark someone as "not a person", there should be an option to also "unmark" them. It can be done by mistake, or for testing, and it needs to be reversible.

Anita Luca 1 day ago

💡

Feature Request

Manual Evidences: Manual Status Change & "Work in Progress"

When adding files to a manual evidence, the status is automatically set to “Completed” although in some cases, not all documents or links were added yet. Therefore it would be helpful to be able to change back the status manually and also to have a third status “Work in Progress” to mark this and not to loose overview.

Frank Tiex 10 days ago

Manual evidence

💡

Feature Request

Filter Computers by Installed Apps

It would be very helpful to identify the computers having installed a given app with a filter.

Frank Tiex 1 day ago

Computers

💡

Feature Request

Show Owner Info on mouseover

it would be helpful, if on the Vendors and Inventory page the owner info is shown already when moving the mouse over the bubble, as it is already implemented for the risk register. Today you need to click on the bubble and then the name is partially covered by the edit dialog.

Frank Tiex 1 day ago

Inventory

+1

💡

Feature Request

Frameworks export needs Owner + Due Date (CSV/Excel) or Customizable fields to export

Right now, when we export the frameworks report, we only see the control details and status. We can’t see who owns the control or when it’s due. Since people tend to ignore email reminders, we often have to follow up manually — and without that information in the export, it’s hard to get a clean overview of what needs attention and who to chase. It would be great if you could extend the current export to include additional columns for Owner and Due date / Expiry date, so we can easily filter and manage follow-ups in Excel - even comments. Please update the frameworks export (CSV/Excel) to include at least: Control ID, Control Title, Status, Owner, and Due Date/Expiry Date. This would make weekly follow-ups and audit prep much easier for us. Or even better, to have the export customizable to whichever fields you need.

Yevheniia Hovorova 26 days ago

Frameworks page

💡

Feature Request

Allow vendors to be reviewed without selecting an authentication method

Currently in the Vendors review flow, selecting a login/authentication method is mandatory to mark a vendor as Reviewed. However, not all vendors provide software or platforms that require authentication. Context Some vendors (e.g. law firms or consultants) do not offer any system requiring a login. In these cases, we are forced to select an incorrect authentication method just to complete the review. Proposed solution Add a “No authentication required / Not applicable” option that allows vendors to be marked as Reviewed without selecting a login method.

Frank Tiex About 1 month ago

Vendor management

💡

Feature Request

No notifications for self-triggered events

For example, if you assign a manual verification to yourself, you will subsequently receive an email stating that you have assigned this manual verification to yourself. It would be good if you only received notifications when the activity was performed by someone else.

Bernhard Krämer 4 days ago

Low Priority

+1

💡

Feature Request

Ability to see all accounts that an employee has signed up for

I recently switched from another tool to Secfix, so I'm looking for a feature they offer, and I wish I had a screenshot to show you. Somehow, they are able to list all of the SaaS accounts that an email in our domain has signed up for. For example, instead of just Google, I know that x person has access to ChatGPT, Cursor, Atlassian, Docker, Microsoft, Notion, Zoom, Figma, etc., etc. I want to access this information for every employee instantly. It is very helpful for access reviews as required for SOC2 compliance.

Rich Bard 9 days ago

💡

Feature Request

In-app Notifications Tab

After receiving an email with tasks assigned to them(via manual tasks), the user would like to log into Secfix and see their specific tasks to do in one view - in a Notifications tab.

Elisabeth Fockel - LANOS About 2 months ago

💡

Feature Request

In-app quarterly reminders for access reviews and ability to attach proof

Today I have to create a calendar for my planned access reviews for example, so it is a simple list with actions and dates, that remind me to do it. I added this in Asana, but this might be interesting to be added in Secfix, giving me a reminder every quarter to do the review and providing the proof too.

Bart Slaets 12 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Expand Vendors to include Partners and other third parties

Problem The current Vendors section is limited in scope and suggests that only software vendors should be listed. In practice, organizations work with different types of third parties, such as: infrastructure providers, partners involved in collaborative development, customers participating in joint projects. These entities are currently not clearly represented in the Vendors section, although they are relevant from a risk and compliance perspective. Proposed solution Rename Vendors to Vendors & Partners, or extend the section to explicitly support different third-party types (e.g. vendor, partner, customer, infrastructure provider). Benefits More accurate representation of third-party relationships Better coverage of non-software and collaborative partners Improved clarity and usability for customers

Frank Tiex About 1 month ago

Vendor management

💡

Feature Request

Sophos Server Protection on Linux Notebooks should be recognized by the SecFix Agent as proper AV-Solution

Alexander Vukovic 15 days ago

Secfix agent

💡

Feature Request

Visibility of groups (and use as filter) in inventory/employees

It would be a significant help, if the groups to which employees were assigned to already were visible and used for filtering in the inventory section. Especially the reporting assignment would become much faster with such a filter.

Frank Tiex 17 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Filtering Vendors

As an admin or editor, I’d like to filter the list of vendors by multiple criteria, as Owner, Risk Level, completion of mandatory attributes from the details panel.

Frank Tiex 17 days ago

Vendor management

💡

Feature Request

Allow users to exist in multiple Secfix workspaces

Enable the same user (email) to be part of multiple Secfix workspaces. This is needed for enterprises with multiple subsidiaries, where each subsidiary has its own Secfix workspace but uses the same Identity Provider.

Jakub Wanat 22 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Control which employees are in scope using Google Workspace groups

We want to control which employees are in scope in Secfix when connecting our Identity Provider, instead of having to connect our entire parent organization. As an enterprise with multiple subsidiaries and domains under one IDP, we manage different employee groups using directory groups and attributes. When connecting our IDP to Secfix, we need the ability to select a specific group that defines which users belong to a given Secfix workspace. This would allow us to manage subsidiaries and business units separately and avoid pulling in out-of-scope employees.

Katie Cameron 22 days ago

💡

Feature Request

Allow different link formats while entering links as manual evidences

We want to add links to manual evidence from our document management system, and the links look like this: xyzexample:\\(123) Secfix does not allow this format in the ui, it only allows something like this: https://xyzexample:\\(123) This does not work because we only need the xyzexample:\\(123) and don’t want to edit each time.

Elisabeth Fockel - LANOS 23 days ago

💡

Feature Request