Upvoting and commenting on behalf of Jan W. - at the moment our Customers do not have a good overview over the risks. The risks scenarios are currently sorted by owners, ratings, residual risk rating or status. As soon as the risk number grows, there is no way to sort them by their category.
Customer is suggesting to structure the risk scenarios by:
creating departments;
assigning labels;
grouping.
Use case:
A SMB with multiple departments and multiple risk scenarios needs a good overview over the risks. Adding for instance grouping or labeling by departments will help our customers to assign risks to the right category - for instance sales, development etc.
This helps customers structure the work on the platform and manage the risk ownership more efficiently.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments1
Elżbieta Żurakowska
Mar 24, 2025
Upvoting and commenting on behalf of Jan W. - at the moment our Customers do not have a good overview over the risks. The risks scenarios are currently sorted by owners, ratings, residual risk rating or status. As soon as the risk number grows, there is no way to sort them by their category.
Customer is suggesting to structure the risk scenarios by:
creating departments;
assigning labels;
grouping.
Use case:
A SMB with multiple departments and multiple risk scenarios needs a good overview over the risks. Adding for instance grouping or labeling by departments will help our customers to assign risks to the right category - for instance sales, development etc.
This helps customers structure the work on the platform and manage the risk ownership more efficiently.